Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT]Global warming, was: Air-source Heat Pump?

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT]Global warming, was: Air-source Heat Pump?
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:52:20 -0500
Good to hear from you Rob.  What are you shooting with these days?

Chuck Norcutt


On 12/2/2012 2:32 PM, Rob Harrison wrote:
> I missed this thread (just occasionally checking in on the web these days)
> but if anyone has questions about efficient mechanical systems, I am happy
> to share what I know about them off-list. I'm not a mechanical engineer,
> but I've been seriously engaged in Passive House (Passivhaus) since 2009,
> and have learned heaps about this kind of thing. (Passive House reduces
> heating energy requirements by 90%, *before* adding any on-site energy
> sources like photo-voltaic panels. In order to do that everything including
> both the envelope of the building and the mechanical systems, has to be as
> efficient as possible. Click here to read more on my
> site<http://harrisonarchitects.com/passive_house>.)
>   For the most recent Passive House (the second in Seattle) on which I
> consulted <http://www.cascadebuilt.com/projects/park-passive/> we used a
> mini-split air-source heat pump for space heating, and an air-source heat
> pump water heater for domestic hot water. We put the DHW tank inside the
> heated space, and ducted intake and exhaust to the outside. Good stuff.
>
> Rob in Seattle
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Brian Gray <bsg017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>     As a retired scientist, and for the record, I have to say that I am
>>     with Chris Barker when he said
>> <And I agree with you: whether or not climate change is caused by us,
>> there is n
>> o excuse for wasting scarce resources.  But for the record I and many
>> scientists
>>   of my acquaintance are astounded that anyone still has any doubt.>
>>
>> And I feel that Ken Norton is being overly complacent when he says that
>> the worl
>> d would not have major difficulty in coping with a 20ft rise in sea level.
>>   Woul
>> d not the significant reduction in  land area available for human
>> occupation cau
>> se significant problems, political as well as technical, even in the
>> majority of
>>   countries which have land 20ft above current sea level? And political
>> problems
>> can be more difficult to overcome than technical problems as can indeed be
>> seen
>> in the current debate about how to react to global temperature data.
>>
>> Like Chris, I like to reduce resource usage and am aware that my current
>> car giv
>> es me over 50 miles per UK gallon whereas fifty years ago a car with much
>> lower
>> performance and comfort did not give me much over half that.   And the gas
>> energ
>> y used in heating the my home has dropped by a similar amount in thirty
>> years as
>>   I have improved insulation and the efficiency of the boiler/furnace.  But
>> I dou
>> bt if I will be using a twenty year old camera for a lot longer!
>>
>> Brian Gray
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz