Oh, I definitely like the image and I certainly wouldn't suggest it be
muddied. It's just that I and the Unblown Moose are harsh critics of
pure white (at least where it doesn't belong which is pretty much
everywhere). Maybe you can fix it in ACR with the tone curve. You
might be able to fix it with the parametric range adjusters rather than
going whole hog to the (uh, oh!) point method.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/6/2012 7:38 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> I run into the problem that if I pull back the highlights I get comments
> that the scan is muddy. Most of the comments on this one have been very
> positive. I hate to start manipulating more when the vast majority of the
> comments are positive. It's extremely frustrating.
>
> Tina
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> wrote:
>
>> I used to shoot lots of color Porta but didn't even know there had been
>> a B&W Portra. This shot looks good except for the small blown highlight
>> areas. Can you pull them back?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/2012 3:36 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>> PESO:
>>>
>>> Somehow I don't remember ever shooting Kodak Portra 400BW but I did:
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/image/147727060
>>>
>>> C&C greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Tina
>>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|