Oh... all right... if you say so. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/7/2012 7:26 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> I don't see anything blown badly enough to require any messing around
> whatsoever. This is a location portrait/candid taken in an
> uncontrolled environment but being subjected to the Laws of
> Photographic Perfection, which in this case Do Not Apply.
>
> Humbly submitted,
>
> --Bob Whitmire
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Oh, I definitely like the image and I certainly wouldn't suggest it
>> be muddied. It's just that I and the Unblown Moose are harsh
>> critics of pure white (at least where it doesn't belong which is
>> pretty much everywhere). Maybe you can fix it in ACR with the tone
>> curve. You might be able to fix it with the parametric range
>> adjusters rather than going whole hog to the (uh, oh!) point
>> method.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 12/6/2012 7:38 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>>> I run into the problem that if I pull back the highlights I get
>>> comments that the scan is muddy. Most of the comments on this
>>> one have been very positive. I hate to start manipulating more
>>> when the vast majority of the comments are positive. It's
>>> extremely frustrating.
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|