I find it interesting that the hands don't absorb this shock. Or maybe
they do and it would be worse if they didn't. I wonder how the Canon 5D
would do in this sort of test. It has mirror lock but it's a pain to
use it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/1/2013 8:31 PM, Peter Klein wrote:
> Just for fun, I did a quick-and-dirty yesterday. Here are a couple of
> hand-held shots with the E-M5 and Panny 20/1.7 at 100%, at 1/125 and
> 1/250 sec. They are typical of other results I've gotten with this
> camera. At higher or lower speeds, the difference between Anti-shock on
> vs. off is less to nil.
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/340606-1/EM5-125th-ShutterShock.jpg>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/340609-1/EM5-250th-ShutterShock.jpg>
>
> The issue is definitely there. It's also subtle enough that one could
> easily mistake it for misfocus, unsteady shooter, or loss of contrast at
> higher ISOs. My guess is that like all camera shake issues, focal
> length will magnify it, so I'll probably see more of it with the 45/1.8
> or the 14-54 zoom at maximum.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
