normally on the lug, the size of the file and of the displayed photo
is left for the uploader to decide, I like this a lot
ph
Le 7 janv. 13 à 05:30, Moose a écrit :
> On 1/6/2013 7:43 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> But regardless of that one image I'm concerned about all of them
>> being
>> resized and not resharpened in slideshow. They all look worse than
>> what
>> I put up there.
>
> I just looked at it again, with image display working again.
>
> I don't like what I see in this area. Poorly up sized images for the
> slide show, and a full screen option that is even
> worse looking, do not please me. Whatever others may think of my web
> images, I go to some trouble to get them as close
> to what I want them to look like as I am able.
>
> Again, the tried and true LUG model is better. I've never thought
> LUG is perfect, but is seems better in the area of
> image display size.
>
> Even when I did a photo book, I sized all images to the native
> resolution of their page, so no diddling occurred.
>
> Picky Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|