Re: [OM] Confession, and a little confusion [was Panny 20mm/1.7 DOF]

[Ken Norton]

> I can't say that my 20/1.7 is sharper than my 28/2, but it sure is better
> than my 35/2. A good lens and worth the money, despite the plasticky feel..

Yeah, I have to chill on this. The list police is going to come down
on me for inappropriate non-digital content.

I did have the choice of the 35/2 and 28/2. The 35/2 is likely the
more "usable lens" being that it's my ideal focal-length and generates
a more organic image, but the 28/2 is the better lens in pretty much
every measurable way. Besides, the 35/2 is too much a duplication of
the 35-80.
-- 
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/