Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Vision

Subject: Re: [OM] Vision
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:25:02 -0800
On 1/30/2013 2:54 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:.
> Yeh, much PP goings on---and it is totally required. I think I posted
> this before regarding Helmhotz's view on the human eye as an optical
> instrument. An English translation of his Popular Lectures on
> Scientific Subjects was published in NY in 1873. He cited afterimages,
> spherical aberration, astigmatism,  CA, vitreous opacities, the
> physiological blind spots due to the optic nerve head and its
> associated retinal vessels, and the less than perfect clarity of the
> cornea and lens even when no actual opacities were present:
>
> "Now it is not too much to say that if an optician wanted to sell me an
> instrument which had all these defects, I should think myself quite
> justified in blaming his carelessness in the strongest terms, and
> giving him back his instrument. "

He didn't know the power of first rate, intelligently adaptable firmware. :-)

> Curiously ...   So nature, like Moose has no issue fixing
> things in post rather than up front where it might be too bulky or
> expensive to do so.

Imitating Nature Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz