Re: [OM] Awww, poop.

[Andrew Fildes]

I have the Panasonic 45-200mm which I prefer to the Oly 40-150. 
I found that it focussed better on my E-P2 
It has the range you want and it's about $280 from B&H which is pretty good.
In fact it's the same price as the Oly.
Downside -= 1.8x the weight. But weight adds stability.
90-400mm equivalent against 80-300mm and the same aperture.
And if you go to a Panasonic body at some point, you've still got stabilisation.

Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813



On 04/02/2013, at 4:49 PM, Paul Braun wrote:

> Oh, well.  Guess it goes on the pile of useless camera stuff and I have 
> to start looking for something to replace that range.   I have the 
> 75-150 which I can use, but it's not quite as long.  Neither one were 
> speed demons.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/