Anyway, sharpness is bourgeois concept.
On 17 Feb 2013, at 23:42, Paul Braun wrote:
> On 2/17/13 16:30 : , Moose wrote:
>> How the Hel_ can you tell?
>>
>> I read this regularly in comments on web images, both here and elsewhere,
>> with the implicit or explicit context that the
>> camera, lens and/or photographer are responsible for that. "Wow! That
>> Glotzmayer 63/4.5 is amazingly sharp!" about an
>> 800 pixel wide image. Feh!
> Hey! Don't put that lens down. The Glotzmayer 63/4.5 is pretty much my
> Holy Grail of lenses. My fondest dream is to one day mount one up on
> the Glotzmayer/MFT adapter ring and just amaze everyone with the results.
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Paul Braun
> Certified Music Junkie
> Valparaiso, IN
>
>
> "It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever." - David St. Hubbins
>
> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life" - Harlan Howard
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
Blog:
http://www.nathansmusings.eu/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|