This resembles arguing about the flow rates and turbidity as we circle the
drain. Interesting at the moment, intellectually challenging to boot, but
ultimately irrelevant because, well, we're all going down the drain.
On Feb 22, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> If you're serious about understanding the modeling problem of chaotic
> systems (rather than assuming I really am a stupid shill) you can find a
> synopsis and discussion here:
> <http://climateaudit.org/2006/05/15/gerry-browning-numerical-climate-models/>
> There are a few snide comments in the discussion but most of it is
> serious discussion of the complexity (and feasibility) of the work.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|