Aye, it do a fine job. For sure!
--Bob
On Feb 23, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 7:41 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> I called it matrix, but the exif calls it multi-segment. At any rate, this
>> is straight metering, No compensation at all. Not to say I haven't done some
>> post in Lightroom, but it's essentially as metered by the camera. I read
>> somewhere that some wag thought Nikon had really screwed up with the D800
>> matrix, but that hasn't been my experience. I'm awed by what it seems
>> capable of. There are other shots with wide Dynamic Range that the meter
>> doesn't seem to breath hard while handling. Again, post is necessary for
>> tweaking, but the essential exposure is there. I think I recall reading in
>> Thom Hogan's review of the D800 that it's capable of a little more than 11
>> stops of dynamic range at base ISO of 100.
>
> Can't complain about how the E-M5 handles the same thing. Straight into the
> sun.
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2805>
>
> Catching that famous little flash,
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2815>
>
> Or the delicate aftermath. <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2821>
>
> I know sunrises/sets are cliched, but darn they are pretty! I used this one
> to see how the E-M5 would handle it.
> <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=2804>
>
> Most of the images in this little gallery are just as they came out of ACR
> defaults for the camera. Some vignetting
> corrected on a couple, a little adjustment to a couple, but all exposures as
> the camera did it at -0.3 EV, but one.
>
> One is at -1 EV. I think I must have done that to darken the water, but the
> one next to it at -0.3 would have done as well.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|