Without knowing the price of the Sigma, I'd look seriously at the MZ60/2.8
macro in this focal length. It's not a pancake, about the same size at the
12-50, has AF and apparently has wonderful optics.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Piers Hemy [mailto:piers@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: February 27, 2013 1:16 PM
To: 'Olympus Camera Discussion'
Subject: Re: [OM] Sigma MFT lenses
Same range, granted, but the Zuiko is only (a mere, trifling) 2.5 stops faster.
That strikes me as invaluable on a 4/3 sensor.
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Braun [mailto:pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 27 February 2013 18:10
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Sigma MFT lenses
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You aren't equating a Sigma 60/2.8 with an OM Zuiko 50/1.2 are you,
> Shirley Nott?
>
>
Well, right now it's just a "same range" comparison. None of the sites have
actually had their hands on one to do a test. In a perfect world, it would be
nice and sharp and bokeh-ey and as light as that Panny 20/1.7 I have.
--
Paul Braun
Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Harlan Howard
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|