Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Panny 14-42 X [was Purse and/or Camera [was More ...

Subject: Re: [OM] Panny 14-42 X [was Purse and/or Camera [was More ...
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:36:24 +0100
Because I do not want enter the slippery slope of Photoshop manipulation. My 
ideal photograph is one that needs as little work in LR as possible.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Mar 19, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> It's not at all clear to me why you should want to impose limitations on 
> your editing to only what could be done in the wet darkroom.  The 
> limitations were imposed by the technology available.  I'm sure those 
> limits were not all that the practitioners desired.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> On 3/19/2013 2:09 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation, Moose. Actually I do crop quite a bit,
>> this is the one area where I have no self-imposed limitations, since
>> cropping was also common in the wet printing days.
>> 
>> Cheers, Nathan
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz