Do not even think about loading the proprietary software, Bob. LR4.4 (but
not 4.3) should do nicely, while Fuji's port of Silkypix is abominable (no
manual, sketchy html help files, awful interface) - and the Fuji image
management software which sits atop that is worse still.
I speak from X10 experience, I suspect it is all too transferable.
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Whitmire [mailto:bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 30 April 2013 17:59
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] LR5 beta
Hum . . . not good news. I don't have Aperture to compare, and I haven't
loaded Fuji's proprietary software on my computer, but X-100s RAW files look
pretty good in my LR4.4. But, as I said, I have nothing to compare them
with. It might help if I got out and took more pictures with it, too. Sigh.
--Bob
On Apr 29, 2013, at 7:47 AM, SwissPace wrote:
> I had a quick look at some of my Xpro-1 raw files (sorry I know this
> is the Olympus list but the X-Pro1 is closer to my 3Ti in use than the
> OMD) and I have to say (which I really didn't want to be the case)
> that apart from the colour rendition Aperture's view of my raw files
> look much better in terms of detail and quite a bit of border is
> missing from the LR files which I have just discovered from viewing the
aperture version.
>
> So I may just have to switch back Damn just when I was getting used to
> the LR workflow - don't you just hate it when that happens
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|