The flash sync spec on the E-M5 is 1/250 but I find that I can get good
sync with a T-32 at 1/320. I suspect it's not a real change. Or
perhaps some shutters could always achieve it but now they're claiming
it for all with perhaps better quality control.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/10/2013 8:46 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> To me the most attractive item is Wi-Fi remote shooting. 1/8000s, 1/320s
> flash sync with built-in flash and higher res. LCD are nice improvement too.
> I also like its look better than the OM-D. Of course, for an OM-D owner,
> there is not much reasons to change or add the E-P5.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> On 5/10/2013 7:39 AM, JOHN DUGGAN wrote:
>>> It is just crying out for a VIEWFINDER!!!!!!!!
>>
>> Then it's called an OM-5. The are in most ways the same camera, but for
>> the viewfinder on one.
>>
>> Take a look at the pics and specs here.
>> <http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympus-pen-ep5/3>
>>
>> Unlike most makers, Oly gives one a choice. Instead of complaining, choose
>> the one that meets your needs. :-)
>>
>> If you must have both, there IS a new, higher rez add-on viewfinder, but I
>> really can't see the point.
>>
>> Elucidation Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|