Re: [OM] IMG: 40,000!

[Andrew Fildes]

I can imagine, but it's tricky.
For instance, if an image is used in a magazine as part of a feature, that's 
editorial. But if the same image is used on the cover, that's an inducement to 
buy and hence 'commercial' and requires a release. The magazine for which I 
write (note that, Barker) has a strict policy of stock photos only on the cover 
for that reason. It would be interesting to ask whether the same rules apply to 
web sites - home page versus feature pages. Its possible, but untested.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813



On 14/05/2013, at 11:03 AM, Tina Manley wrote:

> Model
> releases are only needed for advertising and I can't imagine advertising
> use for most of my photos!

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/