Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante
From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 06:28:29 +0200
What is the in-cam jpeg engine and is it relevant for someone who shoots only 
Raw? No camera of mine is ever sullied with jpeg.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Jun 5, 2013, at 1:34 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:

> Yes, passed the Cheeta test with flying colors. I don't see much 
> evidence of
> demosaicing  "watercolor"  artifacts.  I wonder if this is from the 
> in-cam jpeg engine that seems to do
> the best job.  I'll have to look at 300%   at the foliage in the 
> corners on my calibrated monitor when I get home
> to be sure.
> The image may then be spoiled.  ;-)
> 
> Standard Bayer, Mike
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz