Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:18:48 -0700
On 6/8/2013 11:43 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> ... I want the flexibility.

Exactly. Even ignoring any color, contrast, etc. manipulation, JPEGs often have 
artifacts at the pixel level that are 
much less apparent in carefully processed Raw files.

> And in those case where all my post-processing consists of cropping and 
> hitting the AUTO button in Lightroom, surely my computer can do it at least 
> as well as the one built into the camera.

I agree. There are E-thingie folks who would not. The famous Oly colors, 
especially skin tones, tend to diminish in 
magic when processed from Raw in anything other than Oly software, which 
applies the same computations as the camera.

Or so I am told. When I shoot both JPEG and Raw with Pens or the E-M5, I see no 
color differences worth note between the 
JPEGs and Raw processed with ACR. But then, I mess with stuff. :-)

Color Me Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz