Ken, thanks.
Mind if I ask why you suggest the 24/2 over the 21/2?
Is it more than just focal length? Is the 24 sharper, more contrast and
better handler of flare, and better bokeh?
It certainly is cheaper. And, in my recent bout of Zuikoholic GAS, I've
already bagged a 24/2.
regards
Vick
On 20/06/2013 6:10 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> ... Personally, I'd get the 24/2 over the 21/2. ...
>
> -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|