Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?

Subject: Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?
From: "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:51:51 -0500
No, I decided that I needed both. And used them both, and wish there was a 
digital body like the OM4 and I would be using them more.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Vick Ko
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 4:45 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Just how good is the 21mm f2?

So.... instead of the 21mm f2, I should get a 28mm f2 instead?  Sure
would be easier on the pocket book.

And to cloud the issue, what about the 24mm f2?

regards
Vick


On 20/06/2013 1:02 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> To answer in one sentence, so good that mine's not for sale. A little
> deeper, it is amazing, although not as good as the 28/2. The 28 is almost
> zeiss-like in its sharpness and clarity, the 21 is just good but not in so
> dramatic a way. The 21 is, I think, the best really wide lens ever. No
> problems with strange flares and such if handled properly. Not only should
> you own one, you NEED one.
>

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz