| Subject: | Re: [OM] One more lens to look for |
|---|---|
| From: | "Sawyer, Edward" <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Jul 2013 03:22:34 +0000 |
Oh come on, sure you do. ;-). Besides, there's only two F/1.2s so that is easy. > > > I'm trying to tell myself, that I don't need every f2 Zuiko lens. And I > certainly don't need every f1.2 Zuiko lens. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] PS6 raw conversion vs. Oly Viewer 2 and E-M5 in-camera JPEGs, usher99 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sleeping Mime, Nathan Wajsman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] One more lens to look for, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] IMG: Carrying Her Store on Her Head, Tina Manley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |