Impressive stuff, Chuck!
I have sometimes wondered how modern machines multi-process, considering the
discussion around 20 years ago about the different methods of doing so.
Chris
On 1 Aug 2013, at 19:56, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have a single patent to my name
> <http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22International+Business+Machines%22.ASNM.&s2=Norcutt.INNM.&OS=AN/>
> It's assigned to IBM as owner (my employer at the time) but I and my two
> co-inventors are listed as the inventors. I conceived the basic idea,
> Ted Waldron did the really difficult task of implementing it in a real
> system and Khoa Huynh did the performance verification to prove that it
> really worked. But it should be clear that IBM gave credit where due.
> Incidentally, if you read the patent and don't understand it don't be
> concerned. Even though the basic idea was mine I hardly understand the
> language of the patent myself after the patent attorney's got through
> with the wording. :-)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|