On 14 August 2013 21:33, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 1. They have changed the sensor or otherwise managed to add phase detect
> AF. I believe that is the only way to fully
> support all the older 4/3 lenses.
A good point and I await with interest to see what they've done with AF,
but not the issue I have with 4/3 lenses on micro 4/3 bodies. I'm more
concerned with the batteries. Firstly, I don't want to have to buy load
more batteries for a new body to use with my existing lenses, I want them
to be the same size & shape as the ones that power my E-3 and E-330.
Secondly, those big old 4/3 lenses need more power to move the elements
around and the little thing in the E-M5 isn't really up to it. Being able
to use the same battery grip as the E-3 and E-5 would also be nice. It's
supposed to be a system, after all.
Ian
--
Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
prove you wrong. Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is
no aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
-Daria Morgendorffer
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|