Thank you all - your opinions are very valuable to me and confirm my
hesitations about including more or less of the surroundings - had I
presented the images in the converse order or/and without the story I
presume our opinions might have been different too. But your feedback
helps, a lot :-)
Thanks again
Philippe
Le 1 nov. 13 à 18:35, philippe.amard a écrit :
> I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my
> daughter's place.
>
> I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved
> "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they
> spontaneously agreed to.
>
> So my question now is which one do you think works better if either
> does. And why svp.
>
> a)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
>
> or b)
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg
>
> Thank you in anticipation.
>
> Philippe
>
>
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
> to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
