ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math

Subject:	Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math
From:	"philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:19:30 +0100

Get lied to, too?

;-)

Ph


Le 7 nov. 13 à 19:03, Nathan Wajsman a écrit :

> But Philippe forgot the essential passive mode, "to get laid".
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Grammar, was Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, (continued) Re: [OM] Grammar, was Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Grammar, was Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Grammar, was Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Grammar, was Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, ChrisB [OM] I thought that was a joke., Moose Re: [OM] I thought that was a joke., Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, philippe.amard <= Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, ChrisB Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math -Chris, philippe.amard Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math -Chris, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math -Chris, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Bob Whitmire

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Backup - a cautionary tale, philippe.amard
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Backup - a cautionary tale, Paul Braun
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, Bob Whitmire
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - apparently, bad at math, ChrisB
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]