"Compared to what?" For me at the moment compared to what I have, a lowly
5dii.
But it matches the zuikos really well, and has more than enough MPixels for
me.
I'm really not longing for 34 or more. For my work the combined shift
results are already
ca. 36-40 mpixels. Way too big for most clients, and details into the last
corner.
There is granite on floors two stories deeper where I can see every dot in
the material, as well sharp edges in the roof lights. I'm craving for more
(way more) dynamic range out of camera.
Hope the sony can deliver there. The EVF could prove to be interesting as
well.
To be honest I did not tray any of the newer stuff, because I simply do not
need to at the moment.
Iwert
2013/11/14 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > I want to check out the sony as well, but will wait for the first
> > experiences with legacy glass,
> > especially wide angle. I'm convinced the 100/2 will do really well, as
> well
> > as the macro lenses.
> > But what about the shifts and wides? The first looks from the zeiss 21
> > don't look very 'excellent'.
>
> One question that comes to my mind on this is "compared to what?" I
> suspect that I'll be elated no matter what. As long as it works
> decently with my set of Zuikos, I'll be OK. Not really concerned about
> anything wider than 24mm. I suspect that the 28/2 will be an issue,
> regardless of the camera, because of the hotspotting.
>
>
>
> --
> Ken Norton
> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.zone-10.com
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|