Re: [OM] Scanners

[Mike Lazzari]

>   Having a 4000 dpi
> capable scanner is not a requirement because there simply isn't that
> much true data in the image.  Even excellent 35mm images probably don't
> contain more than 8-9 MP of real data.  2400 dpi will probably capture
> all that's there on many if not most images.  Certainly enough for an
> 8x10 or 10x15 print and maybe even 11x14.
Anyone interested in an old HP Photosmart scanner? Free for the postage
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/