Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Another reply [was MooseRant on Low Light Shoot-Out]

Subject: [OM] Another reply [was MooseRant on Low Light Shoot-Out]
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 22:00:07 -0800
On 2/2/2014 2:01 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> ...
> At high ISO it would be a bit too aggressive and loose detail, but that
> seems fixed with this iteration  and I think as good as NI and less
> work.   Hidden in one of your posts
> was that you had succumbed to CC model.  I was a bit surprised as
> though you would ride CS6 quite a while longer.
>
> http://mikepasini.com/corners/2013/10/23-dxo-optics-pro-9-review/index.htm

I don't understand this at all. Too many words describing stuff I can't see, 
awful illustrations.

In the first night shot, the PRIME version has blown out highlight detail that 
the others haven't. Operator error, I'm 
sure, but how am I supposed to tell anything?

On the Bistro, there's not much NR, but all sorts of tonal value changes. For a 
proper comparison, only the variable 
being demonstrated should be changed. Like loudness in music, brightness in 
images can have a big effect on apparent 
'improvement'. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Misc/1-JPEG.htm>

It's easy enough on this one to just make the noise go away. Working with the 
original, Raw file would be flawless.

The cathedral image is even more mysterious. Both the dark JPEG and the ACR can 
be made into quite nice, rather low 
noise images. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Misc/2-JPEG.htm>

Before concluding that image detail has been lost, look closely. A sense of 
sharpness, from the grain edges, is gone, 
but I don't think any actual image detail has been lost. I'm not advocating 
such NR (down AG!), only showing how poor 
the NR examples are in this review supposedly about NR.

The Optics Pro 9 version is quite awful, with wildly changed tonalities, 
including loss of some tonal detail, yet with 
very ugly noise. What's the point?

On the basis of what's shown in this review, I wouldn't touch Optics Pro 9 with 
a ten foot pole. I'm sure, however that 
it isn't as bad as shown. Whatever this guy's other skills, he's incompetent in 
the digital darkroom.

Critical Review Moose

-- 
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz