Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] ()M) A question of ethics

Subject: Re: [OM] ()M) A question of ethics
From: bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:15:06 +1300
 

Chuck wrote- 

Well I was obviously wrong about you quoting 6x17" as
a print size 
rather than a ratio and Ken said. 450-600mm equates
(roughly) to 
18-24". I assume that's the long side and that a 6x17
ratio would be 
about 6-8" on the short side. That would be a print
magnification of 
about 7-10X a 6x17cm negative. Is that about
right?

Chuck Norcutt

On 2/4/2014 9:16 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxx.nzwrote:

>
Some DID buy 6 x 17 format, of which I had none. Size? 6 x 17, I'm
thinking of from 450 to 600 mm. You convert; I'm too tired.

> ////

Brian. 

> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz