Yes, I don't know who the marketing genius was that though the american
consumer would by a camera without a zoom lens. I believe the bundled ones
were left overs being off loaded to make room for the new version. Only
thing that makes sense.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Braun
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Errrrr.... nevermind
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Frank <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For my style of photography, the 9-18mm has a more usefull range since I
> would use the 7-9 range less often then the 14-18mm.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Best, Frank.
>
> PS Just to get an impression: most of these pictures from Canterbury <
> http://wijsmuller.eu/index.php?/category/95> were made with the 9-18mm on
> the e-m5. Some of them were with my wifes camera (e-pl2 with 14-150mm). I
> should look in programm that allows more exif info though...
>
Lovely photos, Frank. That lens works well.
However, it's also out of my budget range at the moment. I'm going after
the Panny 14/2.5. There are a number on the 'bay under $200, both used and
new. Apparently, it got bundled into a lot of kits and people have no idea
what to do with them, so they're selling them off. I don't care if it
doesn't come with a box.
--
Paul Braun
Certified Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|