| Subject: | Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - new portrait |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:34:34 -0600 |
> No, they are supposed to have two of them. > Bilateral symmetry, I believe it's called. I believe there is a lot of support for that. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Disgusting Deserts, Jez Cunningham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - new portrait, Paul Braun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - new portrait, Paul Braun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Paul's PAW - new portrait, Paul Braun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |