f10 !!! at 3.5, not to speak of 1.4, no flash was needed here with
this ISO setting, or am I completely mistaken?
Amities
Philippe
Le 18 févr. 14 à 23:36, Paul Braun a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, philippe.amard
> <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> If I may intrude in this thread - I'd be curious to see some of the
>> photographs of anyone on the list for which a flash was essential to
>> the success of the take - don't mistake me, I just need to learn from
>> you all.
>>
>> Thank you in anticipation
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe whose experience is rather that flash spoils a shot
>>
>>
>>
> This shot: http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=10836
>
> The light in this room was fluorescent overheads and not at all
> pretty and
> not really even. I tried it without flash, and looking at it on the
> screen, it was flat and not pretty. Adding some flash (again with
> the Fong
> salad bowl) and I got separation, even exposure, and good colors
> with a
> minimum of LR gymnastics.
>
> --
>
> Paul Braun
> Certified Music Junkie
>
> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold
> Auerbach
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|