On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Ian Nichols <ian.a.nichols@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2 April 2014 04:35, DZDub <jdubikins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:29 PM, <usher99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I could not get past "OM-G" without going into eye twitches.
>
>
>
> That would certainly have alerted me, being, as it is, a popular
> abbreviation on the internet and in text messages, particularly amongst the
> youth of today. Or were you all thinking it referred to an old film-era
> camera?
>
> It would certainly have me exclaiming "OMG!" if it were true, and probably
> Ag too.
>
>
Both! The OM-G was a decent improvement on the OM-10 in all respects, but
if you had any sort of OM-2x, you'd never pick the OM-G up. I managed to
get one somewhere in my eBay foibles because of something attached to it, I
think. Ag will skewer me, but I don't think I've ever put a roll through
it, though I do believe I replaced the seals on it! But that was because
it was a gooey mess.
Is Paul Schings working for DP? This is worthy of his classic AFJ from
about 15 years ago.
Must fetish my OM-G from now on.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|