Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] use of photo

Subject: Re: [OM] use of photo
From: Paul Laughlin <pelaughlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:54:17 -0700
Well said, Andrew.  And, in all probability, the reason they did not 
seek permission from the White House was that they knew it would not be 
forthcoming anyway.  The White House never gives permission to use a 
photo of the President for commercial purposes.  That company just 
thought they might get away with it.
Paul in Portland OR

On 4/3/2014 11:33 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> If the photo is used editorially, on a newspaper front page as part of a 
> story for instance, no problem. The rights remain wholly with the 
> photographer unless the the subject is demeaned or ridiculed in some way and 
> even then 'public gaze' would be an adequate defence if the subject is 
> normally in the public eye and if no malice can be proven.
> If it is used commercially, as part of an advertisement or 'inducement to 
> purchase' (package shot for instance), then a model release is required. No 
> exception. Or the rights of the unwitting model are transgressed. This is the 
> law just about anywhere where English Common Law prevails and quite a few 
> places where it does not.
> The President (personally, not the institution) is indeed relying wholly upon 
> the law and the company has been behaving very badly indeed. Or at the very 
> least incompetently. I suspect that if the subject was a film actor or 
> similar non-political actor, or a simple member of the public, they would 
> have had their arses sued off. If you submit images to a stock agency you 
> become rather expert in these things quite quickly - iStockphoto will not 
> even accept images that show company logo's on buildings or political 
> messages on car bumper stickers as they may transgress 'property rights'.
> I also suspect that this company and their agency thought that they might be 
> able to get away with because many people would react just as you have and 
> put any objection down to political bullying - which it most certainly is 
> not. Assuming that the President would be unable to object to this 
> exploitation because of the sensitivity of his position - that is a form of 
> bullying

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz