Well, it must be the lenient side in me but I hardly ever care about this.
Mind you, I love flowers, and tulips in particular.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/FF-Steve+_amp_+Lluis+-+une+jolie+fleur+dans+une+peau+de+vache-1090803.jpg.html
I don't mind some slight clipping, sometimes
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/FF-31+aout+09-1120607.jpg.html
and some other times you don't even need color ;-)
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/FF-Visitor-BW-1100202.jpg.html
Enjoy the beauties life, click and enjoy them even more :-)
Amities
Philippe
Le 30 avr. 2014 à 01:59, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> On 4/29/2014 2:14 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> Awww, cr**. You had to go make the bald statement.
>>> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/AG/Backlit_Tulips.htm>
>> OK, OK, a wee little bit of clipping. But seriously, those tulips were
>> clip-me-red. What's a poor photographer to do? BTW, I would suggest
>> that backlit tulips are absolutely the most challenging to photograph
>> and keep from clipping flower there is. There is a purity of tone to
>> them that just pounds the poor RGB technology to death.
>
> OK, a quick check found no such tulips. I've got some, somewhere, but my
> key-wording intern position remains unfilled.
>
> So these will have to do. <http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=12473>
>
> I think they qualify; the poppies were almost new-cle-are in the direct sun.
> On the first two, I show both direct out of ACR, but for a touch of FM, post
> downsizing, and also brightened up with LCE and Curves.
>
> BUT, BUT, no clipped red channel, even after sharpening.
>
> The other three have had heaven knows done to them. And, if you Select
> Highlights, and look at that histogram, you will find a few R=255 pixels. But
> look closer, and you will find that they aren't red pixels, but
> white/specular reflection pixels. I had to toss in some through-lit yellow,
> too. :-)
>
> SO, it can be done! AND without looking all flat and lacking glow.
>
> As Joel has pointed out, one may not want to. But it ain't that the tech
> can't do it. I'll bet even the L1 can.
>
>> Before I uploaded the image, I did see that the histogram was a little
>> happy on the right side, but figured that it was tiny enough that it
>> wouldn't matter.
>
> I noticed. Would have said no more, but for:
> On 4/28/2014 7:59 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> ... The zone-10 version was from the raw file where I managed to keep the
>> reds from clipping and going nooclear.
>
> Managed the later, not the former.
>
>> I was trying to avoid the wrathage of Moose.
>
> Moose staunceage?
>
> Red Tamer Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
