Not my point at all.
Would it have been a negative comment if I'd said 'low cost'? (which was the
meaning).
Not a negative comment.
Merely an observation that corps. who buy huge numbers of machines buy cheaper
ones.
Even if they have to replace them more often and employ a larger staff to
maintain them.
There are short term advantages in that.
And if the medical billing software (Hi-Caps here) runs on Windows, then the
medical practice buys its staff Windows machinery.
BUT the people who are choosing their own machinery buy what they want and that
is often a Mac.
For all sorts of non-corporate reasons.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author/Publisher:
The SLR Compendium,The TLR Compendium
http://www.soultheft.com/storehouse_photopublish/
On 18/06/2014, at 12:56 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I was just responding to your always negative comments about Windows such as
> below: "... the receptionist has a *cheap* Windows machine that runs the
> *cheap* medical software billing package." And exactly what's wrong with
> that when it garners 90% of the PC market?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|