Mine is 154,xxx. It has two little dings on the hood but otherwise
looks like new.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/29/2014 8:21 PM, Don Holbrook wrote:
There's at least 2, (180,xxx range), also with a slight creep.
----- Original Message -----From: Chuck Norcutt
<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>To: Olympus Camera Discussion
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 22:29:12 -0000
(UTC)Subject: Re: [OM] OLympus lenses with unfixable fogged-up glass
I swear I must have the world's only 65-200 with a pristine rear
element. The only problem mine has is zoom creep. JH once told me
that that's adjustable but I've never taken care of it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/26/2014 3:36 AM, Chris Crawford wrote:> The OM 65-200 f4 zoom
had the same problem. I have one of them my father> bought new when I
was a kid. I used to do a lot of photography with it> when I was
younger, but its worthless now. I've seen several others in the> last
couple years for sale, and all had the same issue. Sucks, because it>
was a pretty sharp lens for a 1980's zoom.>> I shot these with it
when I was 15. 23 years ago!>>
http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-details.php?product=866>>
http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-details.php?product=932>--
_________________________________________________________________Options:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympusArchives:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/Themed Olympus
Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|