Could be a lens after all, could it not?
Ph
Le 4 juil. 2014 à 17:50, Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Did someone say something?
>
>
> On 4 July 2014 13:59, Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Yes, as I said - a Baldamatic III!
>> Has everyone filtered me out by now? :-)
>>
>> Andrew Fildes
>> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Author/Publisher:
>> The SLR Compendium,The TLR Compendium
>> http://www.soultheft.com/storehouse_photopublish/
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/07/2014, at 9:41 PM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
>>
>>> It is for an old rangefinder camera.
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|