Chuck, it's not the 28 portion of the formula, it's the 2.
On Jul 6, 2014 7:54 AM, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> I find it interesting how often you talk about your 28mm lens. I have a
Zuiko 28/2.8 and a Kiron 28/2 and I have almost never used them. The same
with 35mm. For some reason I have never become accustomed to shooting with
primes of these focal lengths. I'm sure I use them occasionally when
shooting with a zoom but I don't think I'd be happy walking around with
only a 28 or 35mm prime. What's different about how we see the world
through these lenses?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
> On 7/6/2014 12:45 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>>
>>> Am I doing this right?
>>
>>
>> Shoot a roll or two of film in the OM-3Ti with 28/2 and 100/2 lenses.
>> That will put "perfection" in perspective. Everything else is just
>> computer nonsense.
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|