> re: 28mm. I find it to be the perfect "what the eye sees" lens. Yeah I know
> about all the heated debate about 50 or 53.4mm blah, blah, blah. It forgets
> the peripheral vision. 28mm is the perfect "normal" lens.
I like 35mm a little better for that, but have found that I'm cropping
the edges a little more for various reasons, so 28mm (2:3 format)
works pretty well.
If I'm being totally honest, though, I'm finding the 28/2 to be
slightly off. The lens is great, but it is so highly corrected that it
is almost brutal. I like the lens, but don't love the lens. I love the
24/2.8. It's strange, but it's one of those lenses that is fantastic
in every way, but just doesn't feel normal. I guess that I'm not used
to using lenses that good and it makes me nervous.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|