No, but you have two choices. Either you schlep the file into a plug-in and do
it there, or you pop over to Photoshop and do it as you always did. The going
and coming from PS takes about three breaths, time that is more than paid for
by other bulk processing features in LR.
But then if you don’t like LR, the easiest thing is to ignore it, and its
evangelicals here and elsewhere. As far as I know, there is no Rule From On
High that Thou Must Use Lightroom.
Ignoring, though, is easier said than done. You see someone waxing poetic on
the list and the urge to hit REPLY is damn near overwhelming. <g>
--Bob Whitmire
Certified Neanderthal
On Jul 8, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Replacing eyes is not something that I do lightly since it can be a lot of
> work. Typically, having someone tilt the glasses down by raising the
> earpieces a bit will do the trick. But experience tells me that doesn't work
> for Peg and her glasses. Although I have replaced her eyes they are her own
> lovely eyes. They're simply removed from another exposure without her
> glasses. I usually do a couple of exposures without glasses just in case I
> can't defeat the reflections.
>
> Sorry, Lightroom apparently doesn't cut the mustard here.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|