Thanks Piers. Never read if it trumps the new Plustek 120, but suspect
so.
Mike
I can't speak to the Minolta, Mike, but as to the Nikon 4000, yes,
resolution and DR are much better from the PII. High volume 35mm is not
its
forte, but unlike the Nikon 4000, it will handle MF film with ease, up
to
5x4.
But it's tricky to get set up with current PCs. But so is the Nikon
4000!
To get an idea of its positioning at the time it was current, take a
look at
the current position of the Hasselblad Flextight X5 scanner (which is
the
current incarnation of the Imacon Flextight scanner). USD20700 from B&H.
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus
[mailto:olympus-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of
Mike Gordon via olympus
Sent: 23 July 2014 20:31
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Hasselblad Imacon Flextight Precision II Scanner
Where does this scanner fit into the pantheon of scanners? I have read
that
in high use can be finicky to keep adjusted and operational.
So it substantially outperforms the Nykon/Minolta? Too bad the new
Plustek
120 seems to get mixed reviews but not many current offerings else to
choose
from.
Crumped scanner for ages, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|