Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] The virtues of RAW

Subject: Re: [OM] The virtues of RAW
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 17:45:01 +0100
I did, I did.  I wasn’t reading carefully enough . . .

Chris

On 4 Aug 2014, at 17:17, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You missed the tongue-in-cheek.  He did indeed carry out a lot of dodging and 
> burning... AKA post-processing.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> 
> On 8/4/2014 1:11 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> That's not what I understood about Adams's prints, Chuck.  I thought that he 
>> carried out a great deal of dodging or burning.
>> 
>> Chris
>> On 3 Aug 14, at 22:22, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> I suppose Ansel Adams sent his negatives back to Kodak to have prints made. 
>>>  I'm quite sure they were "perfect" out of the camera. No doubt it was a 
>>> ghost writer that wrote "The Print".  Certainly he would have had no need 
>>> for "post-processing".
>> 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz