Minimal Concerns Moose writes:
A matter of opinion, and not true here.
Well it is well known you only ocassionally adapt FF lenses to MFT.
My post was also meant to induce free floating anxiety
about all larger adapters (by induction) as they clearly require
careful design of the baffles to avoid "adapter flare." I would bet the
Oly OM to MFT one is quite good.
The cheap 3rd party ones have to yet to implement an optimal design for
many mounts to FE mount cams. I somehow did not notice for quite awhile
the not inconsequential additional problem of "sensor flare" using
alts on the A7.
The A7r seemed to be designed to be very forgiving of alt lens use
perhaps by design as few native lenses were available upon release. I
wish it had an EFC and/or the ergonomics were nicer. I am fairly
certain I would put up with the lack of the latter if the former were
present.
Worry, loss of sleep, hand- wringing is indeed in order, Mike
On 9/29/2014 5:20 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
No worry Chuck writes:
You worry enough about this stuff that you have both me and
Moose entirely covered. I'm retired.
More worry is in order.
With a bit more diging noted that with an A7 and a light source in
the
picture, chances are great that there can be
a major problem with inherent sensor type flare (some suggest due to
cover
glass + lack of the type of micro lenses
used with the A7r).
With some cheaper adpaters this is exacerbated by the design and lack
of
flocking. The latest Kindai adapter seems to
get A+ grades in this regards.
Tim can let us know .
Absolutely no concern here. As Chuck rejects all Sony cameras, I
imagine he's
losing no sleep, either. :-)
A flare for worry, MIke
Minimal Concerns Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|