On 11/29/2014 12:17 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
and am certainly not used to shooting at 300mm equivalent. I found I was
always assuming good depth of field and not
really checking it. It's only going to get worse I'm sure.
Yeah, some of these new digital longer tele IS lenses are tricking people into thinking that they can hand-hold at
600mm and expect decent results. Not gonna happen.
Gotta disagree.
Or do you think the two I posted yesterday, Scrub Jay and Fern Head, were indecent? :-) Both shot hand held, as have
been many others taken at 600 mm eq. that I've posted here. IS changes the world.
OTOH Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|