Smoothies are fine.
Champagne is meant to be drunk, the finer the bubbles the better ;-)
Amities
Philippe on a no-donut diet
Le 3 déc. 14 à 21:06, Mike Gordon via olympus a écrit :
CN writes:
The very distinct and distracting bubbles are not my idea of
desirable
bokeh.
Edgy bokeh bothers me but some bokeh is sooo bad it becomes good--at
least if used judiciously in the proper setting. Actually the lens can
nicely render for portraits and if no specular highlights,
the bokeh can be very smooth. No Champaign bubble bokeh for you then
Chuck--how 'bout a doughnut? Get your CAT lens out lately?
Ahh, found the Cooke triplet Andrew purchased--see
http://lists.tako.de/Olympus-OM/2011-01/msg01019.html
http://www.japanexposures.com/shop/camera-lens/ms-super-triplet-perar-4-28.html
Maker claims it outperforms most Tessars.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|