Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ultimately, the 9-18 wasn't needed

Subject: Re: [OM] Ultimately, the 9-18 wasn't needed
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:33:12 -0800
On 1/2/2015 11:42 AM, Bill Pearce wrote:
Chuck, You’ve got the right idea for a wide lens like that. When I finally jumped into digital with both feet, I got the then new Nikon D3, and the only lens I had for it was the 17-35, for me the ideal range. I used it in my professional work exclusively (industrial) and extensively in my personal travel stuff. I am a strict adherent to the "if you’re not photos aren't good enough you're not close enough" advice, and I don't think I've evver used it at the 17 end for a landscape, but almostexclusive at the 35 end. Now that I have the GX7, I have the Panny 7-14, and all I would change would be to make it a 7-20. If you don't find this to be your most used lens, you're crazy.

Crazy Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz