Thanks C.H.
the exposures in the first and third pairs are identical aperture, shutter
speed and ISO
I made a mistake in the second pair though - the Nikon G doesn't have an
aperture ring and I don't know what happened … f4 instead of 1.4 as I had
wanted it to be …
Would you like me to post the fuji and nikon actual raws of either of the other
pairs?
AMities
Philippe
Le 18 janv. 2015 à 02:51, C.H.Ling <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> It is difficult, the exposure looks different and there is no high
> resolution details to compare. I can only see the noise of D700 better than
> the Fuji. The Fuji has strange pattern noise but the problem could be due to
> DNG conversion, it is just like shooting on a magazine page. The tone of
> D700 looks more pleasing to me and the fuji lens also shown more purple
> fringe :-)
>
> BTW, I much prefer to use manufacturer's RAW file and converter.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Olympus Camera Discussion"
> <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 1:38 AM
> Subject: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF - files I had promised to Mark
> and john
>
>
>> During the course of one of our famous-the-world-over LUG-debates on APS-C
>> and FF ;-) I had promised to post comparison shots of fuji and nikon files
>> using the same settings.
>>
>> I found time to rekindle my D700 today (16 months on the shelf, so says
>> LR) and shot 3 pairs of snaps at high ISO (1600 for I wanted RAW, and it
>> is the ISO limit of both bodies in RAW I think) and equivalent focal
>> length and aperture, respectively 35 & 50mm, both open at 1.4.
>>
>> These are indoors snaps, without any other purpose than comparison - rain
>> prevented me from taking the cameras for a stroll.
>> The fuji being small and resting on a table for two of the shots, the
>> angles may be slightly different.
>>
>> The light didn't change outside 95% grey, nor inside.
>>
>> The links below will lead the curious of either list to dng files,
>> conversion is the only alteration I have made to them.
>>
>> You should be asked a "mot de passe" aka password, type: charlie (the
>> first file might have a capital C)
>>
>> 1st Pair
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=qMDBdgufq6BRdADa6p7
>>
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=bEkQMoqnd4f5rRIcBZP
>>
>> 2nd
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=yWV2vbE714whrsQdTcN
>>
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=p8qodHHwn1xAbA4FJ2B
>>
>>
>> 3rd
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=39AKF0uEw4123N0D50h
>>
>> https://filex.univ-lorraine.fr/get?k=7gtbAMRKBQNxwEhU4I5
>>
>> The files will remain available for download for 10 days.
>>
>>
>> Hope this helps all parties give enlightened opinions based on facts ;-).
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|