Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF

Subject: Re: [OM] OT: Recent debate on crop v FF
From: Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:40:41 -0500
Apples and Oranges Moose writes:

<<I suggest you not confuse an ambitious, independent, purely software solution with a reach that apparently doesn't manage to match its grasp with a <<hardware based solution that has already been proven by another manufacturer on a different sensor size.

Yeh, that little outfit with what appears to be one main developer bit off quite a bit. Some of the pattern issues seems to be a problem with the
de-bayerization and nothing to do with the super-resolution algorithm.

There seems to be no other options for this type of multi-shot resoltuion enhancement outside of complex plug-ins for matlab which look like waaaay too much work. Curiously looking at the algorithm and comments from the developer, using a hardware approach with known fixed displacements of the sensor while the cam is locked down solid on a pod should allow for more consistent enhancement of detail closer to the theoretical maximum---bodes well for the new Oly. Currently 6-8 raw files generally max out the detail enhancement with Photoacute though noise always go down a bit more with more files. I don't think the Oly and Photoacute approaches will be dramatically different in the overall algorithm used . Comparison is more like......

Tangerines and oranges, Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz