Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: St Exupery - Was Nathan's thread

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: St Exupery - Was Nathan's thread
From: ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:56:38 +0000
I read the entry for P-38 and it doesn’t mention in the summary at the start 
that it was a virtual death trap.  It had problems of compressiblity at high 
airspeed which the engineers did not solve until well after it came into 
service.  I suppose the requirements of operations forced everyone's hand, but 
such an aircraft would not be allowed into service today.

I do know Honington, as you say.  Unfortunately it’s not a full-time airfield 
now: it has been taken over by the RAF Regiment, and they don’t fly . . .

Chris

> On 26 Jan 15, at 01:53, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> My father used to repair them during the war
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning>>
> as well as P-51s
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_P-51_Mustang 
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_P-51_Mustang>>
> He was stationed at RAF Honington from 1943-45 which Chris is quite familiar 
> with.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz